49.7 F
Saturday, April 4, 2020

City considers renewing sales tax

The 0.2% sales tax would raise millions in funds for transportation projects

A cyclist passes a bus on High Street on campus by the Viking Union on Jan. 10. // Photo by Wilson Turk.

By Kenneth Duncan

This story has been edited for factual accuracy. A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that the proposed sales tax was 0.002% in the subheading and leading paragraph. The correct figure is 0.2%.

The Bellingham City Council is considering renewing a decade-old 0.2% sales tax that would raise an estimated $60 million in funds for transportation projects such as road resurfacing and bike pathing over the next decade.

Approved by Bellingham voters in November 2010, the tax expires after 10 years, with the city council discussing whether to put forth a ballot measure in 2020 for a decade-long renewal. The tax raised roughly $40 million over the past decade according to Bellingham’s website, with the renewal currently in the consulting phase of development.

The tax was introduced by the Transportation Benefit District to raise funds for infrastructure improvements. It funds road resurfacing and general, non-motorized transit improvements. Until 2016, it also funded the Whatcom Transit Authority. The district itself is governed by a board of directors made up of Bellingham City Council members and is advised by Bellingham’s Transportation Commission.

City Councilmember and Transportation Benefit District board member Daniel Hammill said funds will go toward Bellingham’s 2014 Bicycle Master Plan, a city-funded project that intends to facilitate bike commuting through a network of supportive lanes and bicycling networks.

“What we’re focusing on now, and what I’d like to see, is completing the Bicycle Master Plan in a more timely manner,” Hammill said. “Providing more than just arrows throughout the network in Bellingham, I think is a big priority.”

Hammill also said he thinks improvements made from the tax funds will promote bicycle transit throughout Bellingham.

“About 4% of our trips are by bike. That is a number that seems way too low to me,” Hammill said. “It should be around 11% or 12%. To me it’s the system that’s broken, in that we need to provide for better, safer routes for less competent riders and for those who wish to bike commute.”

Jeremy Nolan, a Bellingham-based cyclist, said the city’s attitude towards cyclists is improving. However, the locations of newer paths, like the Chestnut street lanes, can make it difficult for newer commuters.

“I think there needs to be consideration for where they put the bike lanes,” Nolan said. “They’ve added one or two new lanes on Chestnut, and I know people are happy with them, but I’ve also met one or two new cyclists that have said, ‘They’re nice, but they’re also in one of the steepest streets in the area.’”

The Transportation Benefit District’s tax also directly funds road resurfacing, which accounts for all of Bellingham’s major roads.

“Our goal for resurfacing is 5% for a year. We are nowhere near that,” Hammill said. “There are some arterials that just don’t have the proper resurfacing, and I’m absolutely in support for that as a priority … Those arterials are still the prime way that Bellingham residents get around.”

Bellingham City Engineer Chad Schulhauser said the tax successfully enhanced transit services by the WTA. The separation of the WTA from Transportation Benefit District funding allowed for the roughly $5 million in annual revenues to be focused on other areas of the Transportation Benefit District.

“The TBD provided funds for enhanced transit services, specifically Sunday service. Additionally, funds from the TBD went to capital projects designed to facilitate transit service, such as bus stop shelters,” said Schulhauser. “In 2016, the WTA said that they no longer needed support from the Transportation Benefit District, so the funds have since been divided between street overlays and non-motorized projects.”


  1. The city already took about $40 million from tax payers to “improve transportation” with virtually no results. So why we need improved transportation, especially safe bicycle lanes, desperately there is no reason to believe that giving them another $60 million will help. Having them do any work without a dig once policy is insane. We should be doing as much work as possible, to improve our transportation, reduce our impact on the environment, and improve our city.

  2. Yes, we need transportation improvements desperately, but in the past the city took about $40 million for this purpose and used it poorly with no real, noticeable benefits. It will be silly to give them another $60 million unless they establish a Dig Once Policy, to make sure that they’re doing as much work as possible, with the least damage to our environment and greatest benefit to our citizens. As an aside a county wide publicly owned fiber-optic network would cost $50 million, reduce trips, and much more. The COB has a really bad habit of doing things as inefficiently as possible. A Dig Once Policy wouldn’t just help with broadband, and transportation, it would help with distributing renewable energy as well. We shouldn’t be digging up the roads for any project without one. Still, with a government that put PSE on their “Climate Action Task Force”, with no tech advisers, I don’t know why we expect real results. $40 million later, We still don’t have a real, safe, bicycle lane system and we need is desperately. Still, they’ve proven themselves to be irresponsible, and corrupt in the past so I’m not sure that giving them another $60 million will change any of that. It will line the pockets of the developers and special interests that they know.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Must Read

Western lays off all RAs and apartment advisers

'Roughly 10' may remain to work with dwindling ranks of on-campus students This...

Sports: Pros and cons of Seahawks’ NFL draft pick Malik McDowell

Why did the Seahawks go after a defensive tackle with their first selection in the 2017 NFL draft? Coming off...

Dog processional honors the life of Western economics professor

Human and furry friends of Mary Ann Hendryson, a Western economics professor who died last spring, gathered for a...

Latest News

Western lays off all RAs and apartment advisers

'Roughly 10' may remain to work with dwindling ranks of on-campus students This...

Who, exactly, is ‘essential’?

State offers new reporting options for employees concerned for their safety In this April 2019 file photo,...

Do you know this person?

Police seek identity of man who died at Outback Farm By Melanie Bell

Pandemic waste production

Ariel Maldonado, owner of Instagram account @gogreensavegreen, spending time in nature. // Photo courtesy of Ariel Maldonado. By...

How local businesses are adjusting to closures caused by COVID-19

A microscopic view of the virus SARS-COV-2, which causes the respiratory illness COVID-19. // Photo courtesy the Centers for Disease Control...

More Articles Like This