Behind the systems: Western’s admissions policies leave doors open for felons on campus

By Stella Harvey, Ray Garcia and Zoe Buchli

This story is the first section of a four-part investigative project from an advanced reporting course taught by Betsy O’Donovan. We contacted DeShaun Dowdy multiple times to set up an interview to provide him a chance to respond to the allegations being made in this series. Dowdy declined to comment.

Content Warning: sexual assault and domestic violence.

Imagine you’re the director of admissions at a state university. Each year, you and your admission officers sift through thousands of academic records and personal essays, looking for the best candidates. Your office is tasked with vetting who will get in, and who won’t.

In the 2014-15 academic school year, your 15,060 students include an aspiring industrial designer, an environmental law student and a convicted felon, DeShaun Troy Dowdy.

Here is how this choice was made.

Included in Western’s admissions 2014-15 application is a section where applicants are asked to disclose their criminal record. Specifically, if they have been convicted of a violent offense, required to register as a sex offender, or if they have any pending felony charges.

Cezar Mesquita, Western’s director of admissions since November 2016, said that if an applicant answers yes to any of these questions, they were also asked to provide an explanation detailing their charges, conviction and probationary status.

Western’s admissions office flags those files and works with the chief of University Police, the dean of students and the assistant dean of students to assess the potential impacts of admitting a student with a criminal record, Mesquita said.

“There were a few cases where students did meet that level of risk assessment that made us feel very uncomfortable to have the individual have access to our overall campus community, and in instances of them living in a residence hall,” he said. “It’s not done very lightly, as you can imagine.”

Darin Rasmussen, chief of University Police, said several things must be considered when determining an applicant’s risk to campus. When examining an applicant’s criminal history, Rasmussen said he also considers what type of crime was committed, the context of the charges and how much time has passed.

If there are concerns about the person’s potential behavior, Rasmussen said he would consider the resources needed to protect the campus population if the student was admitted.

The Undergraduate Admission office located in Old Main 200. // Photo by Oliver Hamlin

“If that’s the case, that it would require significant resources, I don’t want to take that chance,” he said. “If I felt there was going to be an issue of safety and/or resources … I’m going to say [the applicant] is not going to be a good fit for Western at this time.”

When an applicant’s past convictions become a concern, whether they are accepted is decided among admissions, the dean of students’ office and the chief of University Police.

However, not every decision is unanimous. Rasmussen said he has been overruled in the past, and he has overruled others. While not unanimous, it is a committee decision.

In the summer of 2018, the university removed the questionnaire that asked applicants to disclose their criminal records to meet the requirements of a new state law. The law prohibits public colleges from asking about an applicant’s criminal history, Mesquita said.

“Somewhere along the way, some student with a criminal background may relapse … and that’s going to come to light. A lot of the campus community is going to likely blame the administration and say, ‘Why can’t you keep us safe?’” Mesquita said. “We are doing the best of our ability to now come up with an alternative process … to assess these kinds of risks as we go forward.”

Once a student is admitted, the university relies on campus support systems to address individuals who may pose a threat to the community.

For example, students must follow the rules and guidelines within Western’s Code of Conduct. Further, they are expected to take responsibility for their actions, working to maintain a campus environment that fosters academic success and safety.

Any violations of the code begin the conduct process through the Office of Student Life. The conduct process is designed to be a learning process, promoting an understanding of students’ responsibilities as members of the community.


Read the other stories in this series

Behind the systems: Facebook post accuses former Western student of sexual misconduct

Behind the systems: Facebook post incites administrative action

Behind the systems: Student questions the way Western handles sexual assault allegations


DeShaun Troy Dowdy

Editor’s Note: In this section, one of the sources names has been changed. We have granted them anonymity because of the stigma attached to domestic violence.

In order to understand DeShaun Troy Dowdy, we have to go to the Tri-Cities in 2002, where, at the age of 13, Dowdy was convicted of child molestion in the first degree.

According to court documents from the case, Dowdy sexually assaulted a younger female relative who was under the age of 6. Dowdy was charged in July 2002, and pleaded guilty a month and a half later.

Under Washington state law, child molestation in the first degree is a class A felony, defined as “when the person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of 18 to have, sexual contact with another who is less than 12 years old.”

After his conviction, Dowdy was required to register as a sex offender.

In 2006, four years after his conviction and two years after completing his court-appointed sexual offender treatment program, Dowdy was convicted of assault in the fourth degree with his then-girlfriend, Jane*, according to court documents.

According to the probable cause affidavit, Dowdy visited Jane, despite a no-contact order. The affidavit says Dowdy started an argument with Jane that turned physical, and the two began wrestling on the floor.

At Jane’s mother’s urging, the two stopped, but Dowdy started another argument and then followed Jane into her room when she tried to leave, according to the affidavit.

“[Dowdy] followed her and physically restrained her by grabbing her around the neck in order to keep her from leaving before law enforcement arrived, which she resisted,” the affidavit says.

The two fought until police arrived, and Jane was left with scratches, bite marks and clumps of hair missing, according to the documents. Police separated the two, and Dowdy was issued another no-contact order.

When Dowdy moved to Portland in summer 2011 at the age of 22, he started his petition for relief from the duty to register as a juvenile sex offender.

According to the Revised Code of Washington, Dowdy was able to ask to be dropped off the registry in January 2012 because he had spent 10 consecutive years in the community without being convicted of a disqualifying offense. Such offenses include sex crimes, kidnapping convictions or failure to register as a sex offender.

Under these guidelines, Dowdy’s 2006 assault conviction did not count as a disqualifying offense.

Dowdy had to prove to the judge he was “sufficiently rehabilitated” following his completion of the Special Sexual Offender Disposition Alternative program in August of 2004, according to court documents.

To make his case, Dowdy gathered personal statements from six people, including roommates and employers from Portland. The letters spoke of Dowdy’s personal growth and character. These documents are included in the original 2002 case file.

He also submitted a personal statement.

In his statement, Dowdy wrote that “[he has] grown and learned to be a sexually responsible and moral person, and [does] not believe that the requirements of [his] juvenile self are necessary for the adult [he is].” He also included that at the time, when he was 23, he had no adult criminal history and no additional sexual offenses.

His statement also mentioned that his move to Oregon was meant to help change his life and to allow him to become part of the poetry community in the Portland area.

Darryl Banks was Dowdy’s Sex Offender Treatment Provider for his group and individual therapy during the SSODA program. In a statement from December 2011, Banks wrote, “As I recall, Deshaun participated appropriately in treatment and did not demonstrate any high-risk sexual issues.”

His legal records between 2002 and 2012 combined with the personal statements from friends and sexual assault treatment providers allowed his relief from the registry in 2012. He applied and was accepted to Western in Fall 2014.

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act protects specific student records, such as admissions records, from being obtained through public records requests. Dowdy did not grant our reporting team access to his admissions records. We are unable to confirm whether or not Dowdy disclosed his previous convictions on his application.

Ban the box

On March 15, 2018, Governor Jay Inslee passed a new law, also known as the Washington Fair Chance to Education Act, in result of a national movement called “Ban the Box.”

Per the movement’s official website, the campaign started with supporting convicted felons who face discrimination from employers because of their past. It has since expanded, focusing on advocating for anti-discrimination policies within higher education and housing.

Mesquita said the Ban-the-Box law led to several changes in Western’s admissions policies. Now, Western cannot ask applicants to disclose information about their criminal history.

“We felt like we had a process that was well-established and well in-place for many years,” Mesquita said. “More readily, an outcome of the Ban-the-Box movement is to give those with a criminal record another chance to pursue opportunities that can help them break cycles of violence, trauma, neglect, or poverty in their own personal lives or within their communities.”

Western was one of the only two schools in the state still asking about an applicant’s criminal history in the admissions application, Mesquita said.

Michael Sledge, Western’s assistant dean of students, said that since some of the larger schools in the state had already adopted a new practice, there wasn’t any resistance to the new legislation.

Currently, only students who plan to live on campus can be asked by housing and the dean of students’ office about their criminal background.

“The question that admissions used is the exact question that the housing application is using,” Sledge said. “The legislation doesn’t prevent us from asking that question or potentially denying housing to people because of their answer to that question.”

The university’s admissions office will now only learn about someone’s criminal record if it is self-disclosed. The admissions office also looks for any indications that a student has been involved in lawless or violent activities.

“But as you can imagine, for somebody to self-disclose that is particularly difficult and highly unlikely,” Mesquita said.

According to Western’s Registrar’s office, Dowdy was admitted in fall 2014. The Ban-the-Box law didn’t go in effect until June 7, 2018.

If an admitted student misbehaves, it becomes a question for other campus systems. The next three sections of this series will be published in the following days.

Photo illustration featuring real Facebook comments. // Illustration by Stella Harvey

Reporting contributed by Julia Phillips.

7 comments

  • In reference to the title of this article:

    There are plenty of people with felonies who are good people deserving of a chance and the opportunity to pursue education. Framing this in terms of felons being allowed on campus is irresponsible. I hope the Western Front considers this carefully in the future.

  • I have known different people who have tried to have Deshaun removed from campus for years. I used to see him at the smokers pole every day and he made me extremely nervous and uncomfortable. Hes done terrible things to people for over a decade and western has never given a shit. maybe western will give a shit when thse 3 pieces come out?

    I havent read the next pieces but i urge everyone to follow along. these authors are brave and i commend them for writing this. ive been trting to speak out about deshaun for the last 6 years. Whenever the discussion gets large enough to reach a wide audience, im always met with “if he did so much bad stuff why isnt he in jail?” and disbelief. its almost like people dont understand the amount of sexual violence that goes unpunished.

    Also — lets break it down real simple. WWU cares about money, not survivors of sexual assault. Deshaun attends school and gives them money. Deshaun has created a lot of survivors, unfortunately, but its never been in their interest to remove him. Hi WWU! So glad I moved years ago. You disgust me.

  • People don’t just stop being rapists. He belongs in jail.

  • I am not in support of sexual assault, domestic violence or anything that is illegal. With that being said, I believe in due process and justice and this article is far from it. You’re singling out someone who is not being charged with a crime currently and there is no ongoing police investigations. Where’s the proof? The 2002 investigation was when he was 13 years old and both convictions are over 10 years old. To be removed from the registry he would have been required to do his time and complete rehabilitation. Then a judge, who is much more educated than the authors of this article, would have decided he was rehabilitated. Deshaun has given back to society what he owes. If you don’t agree with the legal process that’s an entirely different conversation he did indeed commit a crime while at Western, he should be charged, but this article provides no evidence. The Western Front is not law enforcement, and are far from qualified to convict and condemn a potentially innocent individual. I’m ashamed of the Western front for posting this slanderous article and I hope it ruin’s the editor’s career, and the front is pursued by all legal remedies available to Deshaun. Even if he is guilty, this article is shameful. You guys don’t even give this much attention to people who are actually convicted. Are you going to out every person who potentially committed a crime? Where’s your four piece article on Kathy Patrick? Paul Stangl? This article is a disgrace. Deshaun is no longer at Western, retains his Innocence and has left Bellingham. Maybe the front should also move on, leave the legal investigations to those qualified.

    • He’s been sexually assaulting, harassing and committing acts of violence every year since his “rehabilitation”. So much so that he’s black listed from half the bars in Whatcom. Read his 20+ police reports on file in the last few years and then stuff your mock outrage.

      Applause for Western Front for keeping this top of mind so more people have earlier warning against him so they might not also be assaulted before the police get something that sticks longer term.

      When the system let’s people like Deshaun continue to harm others it’s the role of the community to alert each other.

      Only a truely deluded person puts so much stock in the criminal justice system and shames those giving due warning so that others might not be harmed. Shame on you “Justice”.

    • The front has articles on both Kathy Patrick and Paul Stangl. Do your research lol

  • deshaun should be in jail, the fact that he is/was allowed to be on campus at any point is totally unacceptable. do better western!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.